Skip to the text
RobustRLlib Tutorial Project Page

PLR-PVL

Prioritised world-model selection by positive value loss

OfflineData-centric · generativeBase · IQLClaims · dynamic shift

An ensemble of world models, prioritised per sample by the value loss they induce.

Features

Feature Value
Group Robust Offline Algorithms
Setting Offline
Family Data-centric · generative
Base algorithm IQL
Claimed robustness Dynamic shift
Shifted-env rollout No
Adversarial network No
Learned model Yes
Training budget 1M updates, batch 256
Original paper Berdica et al. Robust Offline Learning via Adversarial World Models. NeurIPS Workshop on Open-World Agents, 2024.

Mechanism

PLR-PVL trains a collection of world models consistent with the offline data, treats each as a level in the sense of unsupervised environment design, and prioritises them during policy learning by the value loss they induce.

The library replaces the original world model with the flow-matching model of FWM. The ensemble consists of flow models that differ only in training seed, each proposing one multi-step future for the same conditioning. The critic target is taken per sample from the model whose rollout carries the largest positive value loss, measured by the generalised-advantage residual of the current critic along that rollout.

Implementation notes.

  • The selection rule is a learning-potential criterion, not a worst-case-return criterion: it picks the model the critic currently explains worst.
  • The flow models are frozen during policy learning. No network is trained adversarially.

Run the method

python baselines/train.py \
    -c robustrllib/configs/experiment/plr_pvl_hopper.yaml --seed 0
python baselines/evaluate.py --run runs/plr_pvl_hopper/seed0
File Path
Implementation baselines/plr_pvl
Algorithm card robustrllib/configs/algorithm/plr_pvl.yaml
Experiment file robustrllib/configs/experiment/plr_pvl_hopper.yaml

Training is on the nominal task. The configuration files are explained in Train an algorithm, and the evaluation of the frozen checkpoint in Evaluation Protocol.

Robust performance

Normalized score of the frozen checkpoint. Q1 to Q4 are the severity quartiles of each shift factor's scales, ordered by displacement from the nominal setting, and All covers every shifted condition. The last row averages the tasks.

Task Nominal Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 All
Door 62.3 56.0 50.4 29.9 20.6 39.2
HalfCheetah 117.9 76.5 41.0 23.5 18.9 40.0
Hopper 106.7 62.3 53.1 47.0 32.8 48.8
LunarLander 99.7 93.3 85.8 75.0 70.4 81.4
PointMaze 95.4 67.0 51.9 44.1 38.8 50.5
Walker2d 134.1 106.6 79.1 53.2 42.5 70.3
Average 102.7 76.9 60.2 45.4 37.3 55.0

References

  • Berdica et al. Robust Offline Learning via Adversarial World Models. NeurIPS Workshop on Open-World Agents, 2024.